[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector with Metafun (again)

2018-12-04 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
rnative=mp] \setupmathstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
It's very puzzling... but I'll try to get myself back together, by ignoring everything up to the next `;'. Please insert a semicolon now in front of anything that you don't want me to delete. (See Chapter 27 of The METAFONTbook for an example.) [1] 51 52 $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
k $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\o

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-20 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
thstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
tive=mp] > > \setupmathstackers > [top] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \setupmathstackers > [bottom] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \starttext > > $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad > \doublebracket

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d}

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-07 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
gt; \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > \startuniqueMPgraphic{math:stacker:\number"2192} > math_stacker_draw(math_stacker_rightarrow_shape) ; > \stopuniqueMPgraphic > > % so far > > \setupmathstackers > [both] % vfenced] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] >

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-06 Thread Hans Hagen
or=darkred, alternative=mp] \setupmathstackers [bottom] [color=darkred, alternative=mp] \starttext $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbracket{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+

Re: [NTG-context] underbraces slightly too narrow (with MkIV 2013.05.28)

2013-07-11 Thread Hans Hagen
in a next version you can do this: \setupmathstackers[vfenced][hoffset=10pt] is it looks like these commands have built-in \limits, these are now set for \overbrace \overparent \overbracket \overbar \underbrace \underparent \underbracket \underbar \doublebrace \doubleparent \doublebracket